Date: Sun, 19 Jun 94 04:30:01 PDT From: Advanced Amateur Radio Networking Group Errors-To: TCP-Group-Errors@UCSD.Edu Reply-To: TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu Precedence: Bulk Subject: TCP-Group Digest V94 #123 To: tcp-group-digest TCP-Group Digest Sun, 19 Jun 94 Volume 94 : Issue 123 Today's Topics: A request of the past Standard Digital Radio Interface Standard Digital Radio Interface Proposal Send Replies or notes for publication to: . Subscription requests to . Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu. Archives of past issues of the TCP-Group Digest are available (by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives". We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 1994 16:49:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Kurt Freiberger Subject: A request of the past To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu (TCP-Group Mailing List) Anybody know where I can snarf the NET for Z80 that the Karn-meister did for CP/M? I'd like to look at it for an idea. I just happen to have an Ampro Little board or two handy.... 73/Kurt -- # Kurt Freiberger, WB5BBW Dept. of Computer Science, TAMU # # Internet: kurt@cs.tamu.edu | "Even MY hypocrisy has its limits." # # AuralNet: 409/847-8607 | # # AMPRNet: wb5bbw@wb5bbw.ampr.org | - "Doc" Holliday, Tombstone # # Disclaimer: Not EVEN an official document of Texas A&M University # ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Jun 1994 07:02:35 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald J Creager Subject: Standard Digital Radio Interface To: tcp-group@UCSD.EDU I've only been following this peripherally, but I'd suggest that someone (else) look at the Dallas Semiconductor SIMM Styx. 8530-based (and a few other proc's if I recall) there are devices for a number of protocols. There are a few of us looking at recasting one as a very small kiss TNC. 73, gerry ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Jun 1994 11:04:26 +0200 (BST) From: A.Cox@swansea.ac.uk (Alan Cox) Subject: Standard Digital Radio Interface Proposal To: JRA1854@tntech.edu (Jeffrey Austen) > > We seem to have several thoughts mixed together in this thread. I find the > idea of an ethernet interface or an IP TNC interesting, but both of these are > quite different than what I am proposing. > > Here are my goals: > - the principal audience is the end users and the operators of packet > "infrastructure" (digipeaters, nodes, links, etc.) > - should be compatible with all current modulation and coding schemes > - should be compatible with most anticipated modulation and coding schemes > - must be easy to use --- plug-n-play is the primary goal --- I and many > others are tired of this radio-tnc interface hack that we've been using > for way too long (not that it wasn't a good idea at the time; it's just > long past the time to come up with something better) > - must be simple enough to be built into future radios (e.g., the next > generation of mobile radios and even some handhelds) As a software person who runs a major TCP/IP node but has trouble wiring a DB9 this soulds like someone has finally understood why fast packet and stuff hasnt caught on. Alan ------------------------------ End of TCP-Group Digest V94 #123 ******************************